Immigration Appeal Division: Who Actually Has a Right to Appeal a Sponsorship Refusal, and What the IAD Cannot Fix
The Immigration Appeal Division is the Immigration and Refugee Board tribunal that hears appeals from sponsors whose family member was refused a permanent resident visa. You get 30 days from receiving the refusal to file. In its published 2026 figures, with pending counts taken at June 30, 2026, the IAD allowed 594 of 1,449 finalized sponsorship appeals.
Two things make that 30 day clock dangerous. It runs from the day you receive the refusal, not the day you understand it, and an appeal filed late is normally over before it starts. Worse, some refusals come with no right of appeal at all, and one category of refusal can be appealed but cannot be fixed by the IAD even if every sympathetic fact in your file is true. In the refusals Ansari Immigration reviews, the detail that decides which of those three situations you are in is usually sitting in the officer's notes rather than in the refusal letter. Start with the official IRB sponsorship appeal page, then read on for the parts it does not spell out.
What the Immigration Appeal Division is, and what it is not
The Immigration Appeal Division, or IAD, is one of four divisions of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, and it is a tribunal that is independent of IRCC. That matters practically: the officer who refused your family member does not decide your appeal, and the Minister becomes the other party opposite you.
Three different bodies get confused constantly, and sending your paperwork to the wrong one is how a deadline gets missed. The Immigration Division holds admissibility hearings and detention reviews. The Immigration Appeal Division hears the appeals listed in section 63 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. The Federal Court does not hear appeals at all: it conducts judicial review, which is a different question asked in a different way.
Forum | What it does | Fresh evidence? | Who goes there |
|---|---|---|---|
Immigration Appeal Division (IAD) | Hears sponsorship appeals, removal order appeals, residency obligation appeals and Minister's appeals under IRPA s.63 | Yes. Under s.67(1) the IAD decides on the facts "at the time that the appeal is disposed of" | Sponsors refused a family class visa, permanent residents, protected persons, holders of a PR visa, the Minister |
Immigration Division (ID) | Admissibility hearings and detention reviews | Yes, it is a first instance hearing | People alleged to be inadmissible |
Federal Court | Judicial review of a decision, including an IAD decision | No. It reviews the record that was before the decision maker | Anyone with no appeal right, or who lost at the IAD |
Source: Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, sections 63 to 71 for the IAD and Immigration Division rows, and section 72 for judicial review in the Federal Court. Verified October 2026.
Here is the way it is worth holding in your head. An IAD appeal is a second look with new evidence allowed, like resitting an exam with the textbook open. Judicial review is an audit of how the first exam was marked, and you cannot add answers. So if the problem with your file is that something true was never proven, the IAD is the forum that can help; the Federal Court usually is not. If you have already lost at the IAD, our post on requesting a reconsideration from IRCC covers the narrower routes that remain.
Who can appeal a sponsorship refusal to the immigration appeal division, and who cannot
You can appeal if you filed a sponsorship application in the prescribed manner and the person you sponsored was refused a permanent resident visa. That is section 63(1) of the Act, and it gives the right to the sponsor, not to the refused relative.
Then section 64 takes it away again in specific cases. No appeal may be made where the sponsored person has been found inadmissible on grounds of security, violating human or international rights, sanctions, serious criminality or organized criminality. Section 64(2) defines serious criminality for this purpose narrowly and precisely: a crime "that was punished in Canada by a term of imprisonment of at least six months" or a crime described in paragraph 36(1)(b) or (c). Read that again, because the common misreading is costly. The test is what the sentence actually was in Canada, not what the offence could theoretically carry.
Misrepresentation gets its own rule in section 64(3), and it is the one that saves families. No appeal may be made where the refusal was based on a misrepresentation finding, "unless the foreign national in question is the sponsor's spouse, common-law partner or child." So a misrepresentation refusal of a spouse or a child can still be appealed. The same refusal of a parent, a grandparent or a sibling cannot.
So if you renewed nothing and nobody was convicted of anything, which of those bars applies to you? Usually none, and the appeal is available. The branches that catch people are narrower than the panic suggests, but you have to read the ground of refusal, not the tone of the letter, to know which branch you are on. Our guide to answering the previous refusal question on a Canadian application explains why that distinction follows an applicant for years.
The 30 day deadline, and the 60 day one almost nobody mentions
For a sponsorship appeal the Immigration Appeal Division Rules, 2022 give you 30 days, and the clock starts on receipt. Rule 16(a) requires the notice of appeal and accompanying documents to be received by the Division no later than "30 days after the day on which the appellant receives the officer's decision and the written reasons, if any, for the refusal."
The second number is the one that gets lost. Under rule 16(c) a residency obligation appeal, the appeal a permanent resident brings after an officer outside Canada decides they have not met the residency obligation, carries 60 days, not 30. Two appeals, one tribunal, two different deadlines, and the only reliable way to know which one you are on is which decision you are appealing.
What you actually send, per the IRB's own Step 1 instructions:
The completed notice of appeal, sponsorship form.
A copy of the IRCC refusal letter sent to the family member you sponsored.
A copy of the IRCC officer decision notes, if you received them.
Any further document you think helps resolve the appeal, which the IRB expressly invites. Its own example is a document the refusal says was missing and that you now have.
Gather these before the 30 days run, not after:
The refusal letter, with the date you received it written on your copy.
The officer's notes, or a request for them if you do not have them yet.
The ground of refusal, named in the officer's own words, not paraphrased.
Proof of your current mailing address and email with the IAD, because if you or your counsel do not respond to a communication from the IAD it can dismiss the appeal or declare it abandoned.
Anything the refusal said was missing, if it now exists.
Three signs a sponsorship refusal needs a professional read before you file anything: the refusal letter names a ground you do not recognise, the officer's notes say something the letter does not, or the person refused is not your spouse, partner or child. Any one of those changes whether an appeal is available at all, and that is exactly the question an Ansari Immigration consultation answers straight, including when the honest answer is that appealing is not your best route.
What happens after you file: the record, disclosure, and the chance to settle before a hearing
Filing starts a paper process with its own deadlines, and a large share of sponsorship appeals end before anyone stands up at a hearing. On the IRB's 2026 figures, abandonments and withdrawals alone were about 29% of sponsorship finalizations, and some of the appeals recorded as allowed were resolved by the Minister consenting at an ADR conference rather than at a hearing. The IRB does not publish that split. Under rule 20(1) the Minister must prepare the appeal record, and in a sponsorship appeal it contains the refused permanent resident visa application, the sponsorship application and undertaking, the written reasons for the refusal, and any document the Minister holds that is relevant to the refusal or to any issue in the appeal.
Your own evidence then runs on a clock tied to that record rather than to the hearing. Rule 26 requires your documents to be received no later than 60 days after the day you receive the appeal record. Rule 27 gives you until 30 days before the hearing for a document filed in response to the other side's evidence.
Before a hearing, the IAD may require the parties to take part in an informal resolution process under rule 64, and in practice that means an ADR conference. The IRB describes it as a mediation like process in which an Early Resolution Officer, an IRB employee, runs a discussion with the Minister's counsel and with you and your counsel, aiming either at the Minister consenting to the appeal being allowed or at you withdrawing it. Two mechanics are worth knowing. Under rule 70(2) a member who facilitates an ADR conference must not hear the appeal unless the parties agree. And under rules 66 and 67 the information given in the process is confidential, with exceptions, but a document provided for the process is not confidential and can be used for the rest of the appeal.
One more feature of this forum surprises almost everyone. Immigration appeals are public. Members of the public can attend most hearings, the information you use may appear in the written decision, and the IRB states plainly that "If a member of the public or the media asks for a copy of the documents in your appeal, the IAD will provide one." The only exception is a confidentiality order, which the IRB frames as exceptional, for example where safety is at risk. If your appeal depends on medical records or on the intimate history of a relationship, that is a real decision to make with open eyes, not a detail.
What the immigration appeal division cannot fix, even if it believes you
There is one category where the appeal exists on paper and the relief does not. If the person you sponsored is not a member of the family class, the IAD cannot reach humanitarian and compassionate considerations at all. Section 65 says the Division "may not consider humanitarian and compassionate considerations unless it has decided that the foreign national is a member of the family class and that their sponsor is a sponsor within the meaning of the regulations."
The provision that most often puts someone outside the family class is paragraph 117(9)(d) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations. It excludes a foreign national where, subject to subsection (10), "the sponsor previously made an application for permanent residence and became a permanent resident and, at the time of that application, the foreign national was a non-accompanying family member of the sponsor and was not examined."
Put the two together and the shape of the trap is clear. A sponsor who did not declare a spouse or a child when they immigrated, for whatever reason, later sponsors that person. The visa is refused because the person is excluded from the family class. The sponsor appeals, tells the IAD a true and sympathetic story, and the IAD agrees with every word of it, and still cannot grant relief, because section 65 locks the H&C door until family class membership is established.
One distinction matters before anyone gives up. Section 65 bars humanitarian and compassionate relief; it does not stop the IAD deciding that the officer was wrong to treat the person as excluded in the first place. Under section 67(1) the Division can still allow an appeal where the decision appealed is wrong in law or fact, so an argument that paragraph 117(9)(d) does not apply on your facts is live at the IAD. What is not live is asking the Division to be merciful once exclusion is established.
The narrow way out is in the Regulations themselves rather than in sympathy. Subsection 117(10) switches off paragraph (9)(d) where the person was not examined "because an officer determined that they were not required by the Act or the former Act, as applicable, to be examined." Subsection 117(11) then switches it back on where an officer determines that the sponsor was told the person could be examined and could have made them available but did not, or where the person was the sponsor's spouse, living separate and apart, and was not examined.
Until recently there was also a general administrative route back in. IRCC's public policy for undeclared family members is now closed: the department's page states that it will continue to apply the policy only to eligible applications received between May 31, 2019 and September 10, 2026, and marks the policy as expired. No successor has been announced on that page. For anyone whose application was received after September 10, 2026, the relief that existed for seven years is not there, and the exclusion operates with the exceptions in subsections 117(10) and (11) as the only general openings. Confirm the current position on IRCC's undeclared family members page before relying on this, because a policy can be replaced without notice.
Two refusals, two different answers
The following is an illustrative scenario built only from the rules verified above, not a real client file, and the outcomes are what the rules dictate rather than predictions.
A permanent resident in Burnaby sponsors her husband. The visa is refused on January 12 for genuineness of the relationship, and she receives the letter on January 19. Her deadline is February 18, 30 days from receipt. She files, the Minister produces the appeal record in March, and her own evidence is due 60 days after she receives it. Her husband is a spouse, no inadmissibility ground is in play, and genuineness is a finding of fact, so the IAD can look at it again on the evidence as it stands at the hearing. On those facts the appeal reaches the thing that went wrong, and the evidence problem is the kind that can be repaired with proof, which is what our guide to the genuine relationship test for spousal sponsorship is about.
The same woman also sponsors her 20 year old son, who was not declared when she landed in 2015. That refusal says he is not a member of the family class. She has the same 30 day right to appeal, and she will lose on H&C no matter how compelling her reasons, because section 65 will not let the IAD consider them until family class membership is established. Her real questions are different ones: whether subsection 117(10) applies on the facts of her own landing, and if it does not, what routes exist outside the family class. Spending the appeal fighting for sympathy would be spending a year on the wrong argument. If your dependent child's situation turns on dates rather than facts, our post on how a dependent child's age is locked in for sponsorship sets out how the age is frozen.
What are the chances of winning an immigration appeal? The IRB's own numbers
The IRB publishes the counts, so this question has a real answer rather than a guess. On its immigration appeals statistics page, with figures for 2026 and pending counts as of June 30, 2026, the IAD finalized 1,449 sponsorship appeals nationally and allowed 594 of them.
Appeal type and period (national) | Filed | Allowed | Dismissed | Abandoned | Withdrawn and other | Total finalized | Pending |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sponsorship appeals, s.63(1), 2026 | 1,265 | 594 | 440 | 100 | 315 | 1,449 | 1,476 |
Sponsorship appeals, s.63(1), 2025 | 3,360 | 1,070 | 959 | 172 | 652 | 2,853 | 1,660 |
Residency obligation appeals, s.63(4), 2026 | 373 | 92 | 158 | 20 | 32 | 302 | 537 |
Sponsorship appeals, Western region, 2026 | 461 | 270 | 136 | 50 | 137 | 593 | 527 |
Source: Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, immigration appeals statistics, page last modified August 21, 2026, pending counts as of June 30, 2026. Verified October 2026.
Three readings of that table, with the arithmetic done on the IRB's figures rather than taken from the page:
First, "allowed" as a share of everything finalized was about 41% for sponsorship appeals in 2026 and about 38% in 2025. But a large block of finalizations are not decisions at all: abandonments and withdrawals together were about 29% of 2026 sponsorship finalizations. Measured only against appeals that were actually allowed or dismissed, the allowed share was about 57% in 2026 and about 53% in 2025.
Second, the type of appeal matters more than most people expect. Residency obligation appeals were allowed in about 30% of finalizations in 2026, and about 37% of those actually decided, well below the sponsorship numbers. The same tribunal, a very different picture.
Third, the backlog is the part nobody quotes. There were 1,476 sponsorship appeals pending nationally at June 30, 2026, against 1,449 finalized in the period. The IRB also flags on that page that appeals finalized in a given period may have been filed in an earlier one, so these are not a cohort success rate for appeals filed today.
A caution before anyone treats 57% as their own odds. These are aggregate counts across every ground of refusal, every region and every level of preparation. They include appeals the Minister consented to at ADR and appeals that collapsed on the law, and they say nothing about your facts.
How long does an immigration appeal take, and what the IRB has actually committed to
There is a published IAD service standard, and it is not on the page most people land on. The IAD has committed to completing appeals filed after April 1, 2019 within 12 months of the filing date, and it aims to meet that standard at least 80% of the time. A completed appeal, on the IRB's own definition, means a final decision or a stay of removal has been made. The IRB has not posted its results against that standard: its service standard page still says results will be communicated there as they become available. Separately, in material tabled with the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration in March 2026, covering April to December 2025, the IRB put the average wait for a decision at the IAD at approximately 6 months as of the end of December.
Read those two numbers for what they are: a service commitment and an average, neither of which is a forecast for your file. A 12 month standard with an 80% target means roughly one appeal in five is expected to fall outside it. The pressure behind the queue is real: at June 30, 2026 there were 1,476 sponsorship appeals pending nationally and 527 in the Western region, against 1,449 and 593 finalized in the period, and in the same March 2026 committee material the IRB described the IAD as "experiencing an upward intake trend of 45% over the past 3 years (from 3,200 cases in 2023 to 4,700 in 2025)." If a figure matters to a decision you are making, ask the office that holds your file rather than relying on a number from a blog, ours included.
Who is allowed to represent you at the immigration appeal division
You can represent yourself, and if you hire someone they must be authorized, which is a narrower category than "immigration professional." The IRB's representation page states that authorized counsel must belong to a provincial law society, the Chambre des notaires du Quebec, or the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants, and must be in good standing.
Then comes the detail that trips up both applicants and consultants. On the same page the IRB states that "As of July 1, 2023, all immigration consultants who are members of the CICC require a specific type of licence to represent clients before the IRB," and adds that this applies even where the consultant is not charging a fee. In other words, holding an RCIC licence is not by itself authority to appear at the IAD. The College calls that class RCIC-IRB and states that an RCIC must hold it to represent you before the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada. The CICC public register shows the class each licensee holds.
That cuts against our own interests, so here it is straight. Ansari Immigration is led by a licensed RCIC whose entry on the CICC public register shows Type RCIC, not RCIC-IRB, so it does not carry authority to appear before the IRB. The firm therefore does not represent clients at Immigration Appeal Division hearings. What it does is the IRCC side of the same problem: reading the refusal and the officer's notes, telling you whether a right of appeal exists at all, deciding between an appeal, a reconsideration and a fresh family sponsorship application, and building the evidence file so the next decision is not another refusal. If an appeal is the right route, the honest advice is to retain a lawyer or an RCIC who holds the IRB class, and to verify that class on the register before signing anything.
Local note, because it affects where everything happens, though not where you send your paperwork. The IRB's Western region office is in Vancouver, at 300 West Georgia Street in Library Square, and it houses the Immigration Appeal Division along with the other three divisions. That region covers British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Yukon and the Northwest Territories, so a sponsorship appeal filed from Surrey, Richmond or Coquitlam is a Vancouver matter, and the Western region figures in the table above are the ones closest to home. One trap: the IRB's regions page directs case related mail for every division except the Immigration Division to 344 Slater Street in Ottawa, so a Vancouver appeal does not mean a Vancouver mailing address. Confirm the filing address there before you send anything.
Where the official sources go quiet, or disagree with each other
Three gaps turned up while checking this against the primary sources this run, and all three matter to a reader.
The IRB's client facing page listing who cannot appeal gives five bullets: a Canadian sentence of six months or more, a foreign offence punishable in Canada by a maximum of ten years or more, organized crime, security, and violating human or international rights. The first two are both branches of serious criminality, so the page covers four of the five grounds named in section 64(1) of the Act. Sanctions were added to the statutory list by 2023, c. 19, s. 11, and the IRB page, last modified September 12, 2024, does not mention them. The Act governs. If sanctions are anywhere near your file, do not read that page as the complete list.
The IRB's own legal commentary on this area, its Sponsorship Appeals paper, is dated January 1, 2008, and the IRB has formally archived it, noting that archived material has not been altered or updated since it was archived. The paper also states on its face that it does not constitute legal opinion and should not be taken to represent the views of the Board and its members. It is useful background and it is not current authority. We have not relied on it here.
And the IRB's timing information is scattered across pages that do not point to each other. The 12 month service standard sits on a page last modified in 2019 whose results are still described as forthcoming, the average wait appears only in material tabled with a parliamentary committee, and the statistics page most readers reach carries no timing figure at all. If timing matters to your decision, ask the office holding your file rather than inferring anything from whichever page you happened to find.
If you have been through an IAD appeal, how long did yours take from filing to decision? Timelines posted in the comments are more use to the next reader than any estimate we could publish, so please keep it general and leave out personal details.
Appeal, reconsideration, or apply again?
The appeal is not automatically the right move, and the case against it is stronger than most pages selling appeals will tell you. It is worth setting both sides out.
The case for appealing is simple and it is strongest where the refusal turned on a finding of fact. The IAD decides on the evidence as it stands when the appeal is disposed of, which means proof you did not have in time can still land, and the appeal preserves the application you already filed rather than starting the queue again. Where genuineness of a relationship was the issue, that second look with fresh evidence is exactly the remedy the situation calls for.
The case against appealing is also real. If the refusal rested on a legal exclusion rather than a factual finding, as with a 117(9)(d) exclusion, an appeal can run for a long time and arrive exactly where it started, because section 65 keeps H&C out of reach. A fresh application can sometimes be assembled and filed faster than an appeal is heard, and a reconsideration request to IRCC occasionally resolves a narrow error without any of this. And the withdrawn and abandoned columns in the IRB table are a quiet reminder that a sizeable share of appeals are started by people who later conclude the appeal was not the answer.
The objection we hear most is understandable: my friend appealed and won, so I should appeal. Your friend's refusal ground is the variable that decides it, not the forum. The question is never "is the IAD good at this," it is "can the IAD reach the thing that went wrong in my file."
Frequently asked questions about the immigration appeal division
These are the questions people actually type about the Immigration Appeal Division, answered against the Act, the Immigration Appeal Division Rules, 2022 and the IRB's own pages rather than against general impressions. Where the answer turns on which decision you are appealing, that is said in the answer rather than left for you to work out.
How can I appeal an immigration decision in Canada?
To appeal a family class sponsorship refusal you file a notice of appeal, sponsorship form with the Immigration Appeal Division, together with the IRCC refusal letter and the officer's decision notes if you have them, and the IAD must receive it within 30 days of the day you received the refusal. You can add any document that helps resolve the appeal, and the IRB specifically invites documents the refusal said were missing. Not every immigration decision is appealable to the IAD: removal order and residency obligation decisions have their own routes under section 63, and a refusal with no appeal right is reviewed by the Federal Court instead.
What are the chances of winning an immigration appeal?
On the IRB's published 2026 figures the IAD allowed 594 of 1,449 finalized sponsorship appeals nationally, which is about 41% of all finalizations and about 57% of the appeals that were actually allowed or dismissed rather than abandoned or withdrawn. The 2025 full year figures were 1,070 allowed of 2,853 finalized. Residency obligation appeals ran lower, at 92 allowed of 302 finalized in 2026. Those are aggregate counts across all grounds, regions and levels of preparation, and the IRB notes that appeals finalized in a period may have been filed earlier, so they are not a success rate for an appeal filed today.
How long does it take to process an immigration appeal in Canada?
The IAD has committed to completing appeals filed after April 1, 2019 within 12 months of the filing date, and it aims to meet that standard at least 80% of the time. The IRB has not posted its results against that standard. In material tabled with the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration in March 2026 it put the average wait for an IAD decision at approximately 6 months as of the end of December, in a section covering April to December 2025. The immigration appeals statistics page that most readers reach carries no timing figure at all, which is why many people are told no number exists. For a figure specific to your file, contact the office handling it rather than relying on a published average.
What happens after your immigration appeal is allowed?
If the IAD allows the appeal it must set aside the original decision and substitute the determination that in its opinion should have been made, or refer the matter back to the appropriate decision maker for reconsideration, under section 67(2) of the Act. In a sponsorship appeal that normally means the refusal is gone and the permanent residence application goes back for processing, not that a visa is issued on the spot. Remaining requirements such as medical and security screening still have to be met, so build the time for them into your expectations.
Can you appeal inland spousal sponsorship?
Section 63(1) gives the appeal to a sponsor whose family class relative was refused a permanent resident visa, and an inland applicant under the spouse or common-law partner in Canada class applies for permanent residence without a visa refusal of that kind. No IRB or IRCC page we could find addresses that class and the IAD in terms, either way. So treat the common understanding, that an inland refusal is reviewed in the Federal Court rather than appealed to the IAD, as a position to confirm on your own facts and not as a rule you can rely on. Because the answer turns on the exact decision made and the class applied under, check your position against section 63 and the refusal letter, and read the official IRB sponsorship appeal page before assuming either route, since getting this wrong costs the deadline on both.
How do I write an appeal letter for sponsorship?
There is no appeal letter in the Immigration Appeal Division Rules, 2022: what you file is the notice of appeal, sponsorship form with the refusal letter and the officer's notes, and your arguments and evidence come later on their own timetable. Rule 26 requires your documents to be received no later than 60 days after you receive the Minister's appeal record, and rule 27 gives you until 30 days before the hearing for documents responding to the other side's evidence. Submissions written before you have seen the appeal record are usually written without knowing what the Minister is relying on.
Can paralegals represent clients in the Immigration Appeal Division?
Authorized counsel before the IRB must belong to a provincial law society, the Chambre des notaires du Quebec, or the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants and be in good standing, so whether a paralegal qualifies turns on what their own provincial regulator authorizes. The IRB also states that since July 1, 2023 CICC members need a specific licence class to represent clients before the IRB, even without charging a fee. Check the person's own regulator and, for a consultant, the licence class shown on the CICC public register before you retain anyone.
Related Posts
The Genuine Relationship Test for Spousal Sponsorship in Canada: what IRCC actually looks for on the issue behind most spousal refusals, which is the finding an IAD appeal can revisit with fresh evidence.
Spousal Sponsorship Interview Questions in Canada: the questions IRCC asks when it doubts a relationship, and how to prepare before a refusal is on the table.
Admissibility Hearing Canada: What It Is and What to Expect: the Immigration Division process that is routinely mistaken for the Immigration Appeal Division.
Why work with Ansari Immigration
Family sponsorship representation is a flat CAD $4,000, quoted upfront, with no per family member add on. Every Ansari Immigration file is handled personally by the firm's licensed RCIC, start to finish: all forms, IRCC correspondence, webforms and follow ups included, with direct access to your consultant throughout. No juniors, no call centres. The firm is led by a licensed RCIC regulated by CICC, practicing since 2019, who teaches immigration law at three institutions and trains practicing RCICs.
If a refusal has landed and you are not sure whether an appeal is even available to you, bring the letter and the officer's notes to a 30 minute consultation ($80) and you will get a straight read, including when the honest answer is that a fresh family sponsorship application or a different permanent residence route beats an appeal. And if you have been through an IAD appeal yourself, the comments are the right place to say what you wish you had known on day one, kept general, with no personal case details.
By Amir Ansari, RCIC (R709304), Ansari Immigration, Vancouver.
This article is for general information only. It is not legal advice. Program criteria, requirements, processing times, and selection approaches can change without notice. Always confirm details on official government websites or consult a licensed Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant (RCIC) for advice specific to your situation.
Comments