Does a Reconsideration Request to IRCC Actually Work? What the Data Shows (2026)
A reconsideration request asks the same IRCC office that refused you to look again and reverse its own decision. It can work, but IRCC's own records show it rarely does: across more than 32,000 refused visitor, study, and work permit files where a reconsideration request was logged, only about one in eight were later approved. For most refusals, reapplying with a stronger application, or using the appeal or Federal Court route you may actually have a right to, is the better bet.
Here is why that matters before you send anything: the clock on your real remedy is already running. If you want the Federal Court to review a refusal, you have 15 days to file for leave when the decision was made in Canada, or 60 days when it was made outside Canada, counted from the day you were notified of, or otherwise became aware of, the decision (Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, section 72). A judge can extend that time for special reasons, but you cannot count on it. A reconsideration email does not pause the clock. Applicants who pin their hopes on a reconsideration request for two months often find the one deadline that was binding has quietly passed.

What a reconsideration request to IRCC actually is
A reconsideration request is an informal letter or web form asking IRCC to reopen and change a decision it has already made. It is not an appeal, and it is not a formal process with its own application form, fee, or service standard.
That distinction matters because once an officer makes a decision, they are generally considered to have finished their job on that file. They keep only a narrow discretion to revisit it, usually where something went wrong in the process, not where you simply disagree with the outcome. Nothing obliges an officer to reopen a refusal, and nothing sets a deadline by which they must answer. You are asking for a favour, not exercising a right.
This is also why IRCC's published guidance barely mentions it. The IRCC Help Centre page on what to do after a refused visitor visa talks about applying again or going to the Federal Court, not about reconsideration. IRCC's own operational manual on temporary resident refusals tells officers only that refused applicants may seek redress from the Federal Court of Canada and the Canadian Human Rights Commission. The reconsideration request lives in the gap between those two official routes, which is exactly why so much of the advice you find about it comes from law firms rather than from the government.
Does a reconsideration request work? What IRCC's own data shows
Rarely. In an IRCC dataset of 45,060 reconsideration-request records from 2015 to 2025, released under the Access to Information Act, only about one in eight temporary resident files ended up approved. That is the first real denominator for a question the rest of the internet answers with it depends.
Ansari Immigration analysed the dataset, which covers reconsideration requests on visitor visa, study permit, and work permit files, and found that of 32,051 of those temporary resident files, 4,207 were ultimately recorded as approved, about 13 percent. The approved share also fell over time: it was close to 19 percent in 2022 and dropped to roughly 9 percent across 2024 and the partial 2025 data, even as the number of requests climbed.
The approved share by application type:
Application type | Share later recorded as approved |
|---|---|
Visitor visa (TRV) | About 12% |
Study permit | About 13% |
Work permit (new application) | About 19% |
Work permit extension | About 56% |
All visitor, study, and work permit files | About 13% (1 in 8) |
Source: Ansari Immigration analysis of an IRCC dataset released under the Access to Information Act. Figures reflect each file's current decision as of the dataset's August 2025 extract. Verified October 2026.
One honest caveat, because it changes how you should read these numbers. The dataset records each file's current decision, not proof that the reconsideration request caused the approval. Some of those approvals came from reapplying or from winning at the Federal Court, not from the reconsideration email itself. So 13 percent is the ceiling, and the true success rate of a reconsideration request on its own is lower. The work permit extension figure stands out because extensions often get approved anyway once a maintained-status or document gap is cleared up, which is a different situation from a substantive refusal.

When a reconsideration request is worth sending, and when it is not
Send one only when you can point to something concrete the officer got wrong. There is a real case for a reconsideration request, and a real case against it, and most people only hear one side.
The case for it: it is free, there is no formal process to navigate, and if the officer made a genuine error, reopening the file is faster and cheaper than the Federal Court. If a document you submitted was missed (for example, a language test that was uploaded but recorded as missing), if the refusal letter relies on a fact that is plainly wrong, or if there was a processing mistake on IRCC's side, a short, specific reconsideration request pointing to that error is reasonable and sometimes works.
The case against it: for the vast majority of refusals, the officer did not make a mistake, they made a judgment call you disagree with, and a reconsideration request that re-argues the same facts will not move them. Worse, it can lull you into waiting. While you wait weeks for a reply that is unlikely to come, your 15 or 60 day Federal Court window can close, and the time you could have spent building a stronger new application slips away.
So resolve it this way: a reconsideration request is a targeted tool for officer error, not a second opinion on a fair decision. If you are reaching for it because the outcome felt unfair rather than because you can name the mistake, your effort belongs in a stronger reapplication or in the formal remedy you actually have.
Before you send a reconsideration request, confirm:
You can name a specific error: a missed document, a factual mistake in the refusal, or a process failure, not just a decision you dislike.
You have read the actual refusal reasons, ideally the officer's notes, so you are responding to what the officer relied on and not guessing.
You know your Federal Court deadline (15 days in Canada, 60 days outside) and sending the request will not let it lapse.
The point you are raising could not simply be fixed and strengthened in a fresh application instead.
Have you ever asked IRCC to reconsider a refusal? Tell us whether it worked in the comments, real outcomes help others weigh the odds. Keep it general; for advice on your own file, use a consultation.
Three signs your refusal needs a professional read before you send a reconsideration request: the refusal turns on a document you can prove you submitted, you are inside your 15 or 60 day Federal Court window, or you cannot tell from the letter what the officer actually doubted. Ansari Immigration's licensed RCIC reads your refusal and the officer's notes and tells you honestly which route fits, reconsideration, reapplication, or Federal Court, before you spend time on the wrong one. Consultations are $80 for 30 minutes.
Reconsideration vs reapplying vs appealing vs the Federal Court
Which route is right depends entirely on what kind of refusal you received, and this is where many applicants waste the one option that could actually help them. Some refusals carry a real right of appeal, most do not.
If IRCC refused a family class sponsorship, the sponsor has a statutory right to appeal that refusal to the Immigration Appeal Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board (Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, section 63(1)). A permanent resident refused on the residency obligation at a visa office abroad also has an appeal right to the Immigration Appeal Division (section 63(4)). If you have one of these appeal rights, use it: an appeal is a fresh hearing on the merits, far more powerful than an email asking the same office to change its mind. You generally cannot go to the Federal Court until that appeal right is exhausted (section 72(2)(a)).
For almost everything else, including visitor visa, study permit, work permit, and economic permanent residence refusals such as Express Entry, there is no appeal to a tribunal. Your options are to reapply with a stronger application, to send a reconsideration request if you can show an officer error, or to apply to the Federal Court for judicial review within the 15 or 60 day window. The IRCC Help Centre is blunt about reapplying without changing anything: applying again with the same information, even with an immigration representative, such as a consultant or agent, will likely not change this decision. The fix has to be real, not cosmetic.
Reconsideration requests, which clients pin a lot of hope on, almost never succeed; treat it as a long shot, not a real remedy.
In the refused files Ansari Immigration reviews, a reconsideration request only changes the outcome when it points to a concrete officer error or decisive evidence the officer never had, not when it simply re-argues the same facts. That is the practical test Amir Ansari, the firm's licensed RCIC, applies before advising a client to send one at all, because for study permit and visitor refusals there is no formal appeal, and the Federal Court is slow and costly compared with fixing the real problem and reapplying.
A typical situation, carried through to the decision
Here is how this usually plays out, built from the rules above rather than any single client file. Imagine a visitor visa refused for weak ties to the home country and insufficient funds. The applicant is upset, the refusal feels wrong, and a reconsideration web form is the fastest thing to reach for. Walk it through. The refusal was a judgment on ties and funds, not a missed document or a factual error, so a reconsideration request that restates the same ties and the same bank balance is answering a question the officer already decided. The approval odds on that kind of request sit near the roughly one in eight the data shows, and probably lower, because there is no officer error to correct. Meanwhile, the stronger move is sitting in plain sight: order the officer's notes to see exactly what was not believed, then reapply with a tighter travel history, clearer proof of funds held long enough to look stable, and a letter that answers the ties concern head on. If the notes instead revealed the officer overlooked a host's income or misread a document, that is the narrow case where a reconsideration request pointing to the specific error is worth the stamp. The decision is not reconsideration versus reapplication in the abstract, it is whether you can name the mistake.
Why this matters for your immigration application
A refusal is not just a closed door, it is a fact that follows you. You must disclose previous refusals on future applications, and a second application that repeats the weakness of the first can deepen the officer's doubt rather than resolve it. Choosing the right response, reconsideration, reapplication, appeal, or Federal Court, is not only about this refusal, it is about not making the next application harder. Reading the refusal reasons properly, through the officer's notes, is the step that tells you which route you are actually in.

Frequently asked questions about reconsideration requests to IRCC
What is the success rate for a reconsideration request from IRCC?
In IRCC's own dataset of reconsideration requests, only about one in eight refused visitor, study, and work permit files were later recorded as approved, and the share fell from roughly 19 percent in 2022 to about 9 percent by 2024. Even that figure overstates it, because some of those approvals came from reapplying or from the Federal Court rather than from the reconsideration request itself, so treat a reconsideration request as a long shot, not a reliable remedy.
Is it possible for IRCC to reopen a refused application?
Yes, IRCC can reopen a refused application, but only at the officer's discretion and usually only where there was a genuine error or a document was missed, because once a decision is made the officer has largely finished their role on the file. There is no form, fee, or deadline that forces IRCC to reconsider, so reopening is a favour you are requesting, not a right you are exercising.
How much time does IRCC take for a reconsideration request?
There is no service standard for reconsideration requests, so IRCC may take weeks or months, or may never reply at all, because it is an informal request rather than a formal application with a published processing time. This is exactly why you should never let a reconsideration request run out your Federal Court deadline of 15 days for a decision made in Canada or 60 days for one made abroad.
Can you appeal a refusal to IRCC?
It depends on the type of refusal, because only some decisions carry a right of appeal: a refused family class sponsorship can be appealed to the Immigration Appeal Division by the sponsor, and a permanent resident refused abroad on the residency obligation can also appeal there. Visitor visa, study permit, work permit, and Express Entry refusals have no tribunal appeal, so your options there are to reapply, send a reconsideration request, or apply to the Federal Court for judicial review.
Should I send a reconsideration request or just reapply?
Reapply when the problem can be fixed and strengthened, such as weak ties, thin funds, or a missing document, and send a reconsideration request only when you can point to a concrete officer error rather than a decision you disagree with. IRCC's guidance is explicit that applying again with the same information will likely not change the decision, so a reapplication only helps if the new application is genuinely stronger.
Do I need a lawyer or consultant to file a reconsideration request?
No, you can send a reconsideration request yourself through IRCC's web form, and if the officer error is obvious you may not need help at all. Where a licensed representative earns the fee is in reading the officer's notes, judging honestly whether reconsideration, reapplication, or the Federal Court is the right route, and making sure a binding deadline is not missed while you wait.
Related Posts
Study Permit Refusal in Canada: Top Reasons and How to Reapply: How to read a study permit refusal and build a stronger second application instead of resubmitting the same file.
GCMS Notes Canada: What They Are and How to Order Your IRCC File: How to get the officer's actual notes so you know exactly what was not believed before you decide how to respond.
IRCC Decision Made: What This Status Means and What Happens Next: What the status change means and how to tell an approval from a refusal before your letter arrives.
Why work with Ansari Immigration. On your own, you fire off a reconsideration web form and wait, unsure whether it is even the right route. With Ansari Immigration, the firm's licensed RCIC reads your refusal and the officer's notes, tells you honestly whether to reconsider, reapply, or go to the Federal Court, and handles the file start to finish, no juniors, no call centers. Flat, transparent fees quoted upfront. Consultations are $80 for 30 minutes.
Not sure which route your refusal calls for? Book a refusal review and get a straight answer on whether a reconsideration request is even worth your time before the clock runs out.
This article is for general information only. It is not legal advice. Program criteria, requirements, processing times, and selection approaches can change without notice. Always confirm details on official government websites or consult a licensed Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant (RCIC) for advice specific to your situation.





Comments